Source date: 2026-02-26
Add to my alerts
Crée un compte gratuit pour bookmarker tes guides, recevoir le digest hebdo (changements officiels, nouveaux guides) et rejoindre ta communauté diaspora.
Copy the link Link copied
Close Does this topic interest you?
Receive an email as soon as an article is published by the editorial team on: Training, work
Close This topic has been added to your alerts
You will receive an email as soon as an article is published by the editorial team on: Training, work.
You can unsubscribe at any time in my account > my alerts.
Right to Privacy
Can an employee be dismissed for a reason related to their private life? Published February 27, 2026 - Updated April 2, 2026 - Service Public / Directorate of Legal and Administrative Information (Prime Minister's Office)
An employer discovers that one of his employees is married to a former employee with whom he has a legal dispute. He believes the employee should have informed him and dismisses him "for real and serious cause". Does he have the right to do so?
Image 1 Credits: fizkes - stock.adobe.com
This case concerns an employee working as an internal auditor for a luxury brand. The company discovers that he is married to a former colleague engaged in legal proceedings against the company. The company decides to dismiss this employee.
The company accuses him of deliberately concealing his marital status, which constitutes "a lack of integrity and honesty, which are nevertheless essential to the performance of (his) duties". It also invokes a clause in the employment contract and a code of ethics requiring employees to disclose any potential conflicts of interest.
The employee brings the matter before the labor court. He seeks the annulment of his dismissal, which is based on a matter relating to his personal life.
The labor court and then the court of appeal reject his request. For them, there was a "possible risk" of a conflict of interest due to the marital link with a former employee engaged in legal proceedings with the company. The voluntary nature of the concealment could raise doubt about the employee's loyalty.
The employee appeals to the Court of Cassation.
Is the failure to disclose a marital link sufficient to characterize a breach of the duty of loyalty, leading to dismissal?
According to the Court of Cassation, the employee had no obligation to disclose his family situation. It recalls that, under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, Article 9 of the Civil Code and Article L.1121-1 of the Labor Code, the employee retains the right to privacy, even in the workplace.
Furthermore, according to the Court, the mere existence of a legal dispute between the employee's spouse and the employer is not sufficient to characterize a conflict of interest. The "possible risk of a conflict of interest" retained by the court of appeal is not sufficient. It did not find that the employee's marital status "was related to his duties and likely to influence their exercise to the detriment of the company's interest".
According to the Court of Cassation, an employee cannot be dismissed for a reason related to their private life, such as the identity of the person they are married to.
From April 30 to May 3, 2026 Construction Closure of Lyon Station: expected disruptions Published April 22, 2026
From May 4, 2026 CROUS The €1 meal accessible to all students from May 4 Published April 16, 2026
From April 15, 2026 Pets Forest walks: you are required to keep your dog on a leash until June 30 Published April 11, 2026
From April 4, 2026 School calendar Spring vacation dates 2026 Published March 9, 2026
Source: Service-Public professionals
Source date: 2026-02-26
Close Does this topic interest you?
Receive an email as soon as an article is published by the editorial team on: Training, work
Close This topic has been added to your alerts
You will receive an email as soon as an article is published by the editorial team on: Training, work.
You can unsubscribe at any time in my account > my alerts.
Right to Privacy
Can an employee be dismissed for a reason related to their private life? Published February 27, 2026 - Updated April 2, 2026 - Service Public / Directorate of Legal and Administrative Information (Prime Minister's Office)
An employer discovers that one of his employees is married to a former employee with whom he has a legal dispute. He believes the employee should have informed him and dismisses him "for real and serious cause". Does he have the right to do so?
Image 1 Credits: fizkes - stock.adobe.com
This case concerns an employee working as an internal auditor for a luxury brand. The company discovers that he is married to a former colleague engaged in legal proceedings against the company. The company decides to dismiss this employee.
The company accuses him of deliberately concealing his marital status, which constitutes "a lack of integrity and honesty, which are nevertheless essential to the performance of (his) duties". It also invokes a clause in the employment contract and a code of ethics requiring employees to disclose any potential conflicts of interest.
The employee brings the matter before the labor court. He seeks the annulment of his dismissal, which is based on a matter relating to his personal life.
The labor court and then the court of appeal reject his request. For them, there was a "possible risk" of a conflict of interest due to the marital link with a former employee engaged in legal proceedings with the company. The voluntary nature of the concealment could raise doubt about the employee's loyalty.
The employee appeals to the Court of Cassation.
Is the failure to disclose a marital link sufficient to characterize a breach of the duty of loyalty, leading to dismissal?
According to the Court of Cassation, the employee had no obligation to disclose his family situation. It recalls that, under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, Article 9 of the Civil Code and Article L.1121-1 of the Labor Code, the employee retains the right to privacy, even in the workplace.
Furthermore, according to the Court, the mere existence of a legal dispute between the employee's spouse and the employer is not sufficient to characterize a conflict of interest. The "possible risk of a conflict of interest" retained by the court of appeal is not sufficient. It did not find that the employee's marital status "was related to his duties and likely to influence their exercise to the detriment of the company's interest".
According to the Court of Cassation, an employee cannot be dismissed for a reason related to their private life, such as the identity of the person they are married to.
From April 30 to May 3, 2026 Construction Closure of Lyon Station: expected disruptions Published April 22, 2026
Source: Service-Public professionals
From May 4, 2026 CROUS The €1 meal accessible to all students from May 4 Published April 16, 2026
From April 15, 2026 Pets Forest walks: you are required to keep your dog on a leash until June 30 Published April 11, 2026
From April 4, 2026 School calendar Spring vacation dates 2026 Published March 9, 2026